Monday, February 6, 2012

Wiredglitz

The Tech Savvy Website

Invisible Power

Posted by Max On December - 6 - 2009 2 COMMENTS

powergeneratorMarin Soljacic couldn’t sleep. The problem was his wife’s Nokia cell phone. The tyrannical device beeped on the bedside table when it needed to be plugged in. It could not be disabled.

Instead of taking a hammer to the phone, Soljacic marveled at the fact that this device, and billions of others like it, was sitting a few feet away from all the electricity it could ever need. Why couldn’t it receive power wirelessly, just as laptops get Wi-Fi?

Being a physics professor, not an electrical engineer, Soljacic didn’t know the history of failed attempts to produce wireless electricity. (Thomas Edison and his rival Nikola Tesla were among the first to envision long-distance power-beaming.) Soljacic also didn’t pause to consider conduction, the kind of close-range charging used in electric toothbrushes, which is about as far as wireless electricity got before him.

Soljacic learned that if you could get two magnetic fields to resonate — to sing the same note, in effect — they could transfer an electric current. With two large magnetic coils, he found in an experiment described in Science magazine in 2007, you can throw 60 watts across a room, powering a lightbulb. (Keeping the two resonators in perfect harmony over a distance is not simple; Soljacic spent several years running lab experiments before he built a system that worked reliably.)

MIT, his employer, quickly patented the technology (Soljacic’s name is on the patent) and encouraged Soljacic to start a company. He would sit on the board but find executives to run it full time. The result can be found on the second floor of a brick building in Cambridge, Mass. leased to the company by the big-and-tall tailor on the ground level.

WiTricity’s 15 employees are hard at work proving that Soljacic’s magnetic coils can power almost any electrical device. David Schatz, director of business development, shows me a TV, a DVD player and a computer, all of them wireless.

“This was our No. 1 request from business users,” Schatz says, switching on a projector. “Look: no batteries, no wires, nothing up my sleeve.” The coil sending out the power is hidden behind an abstract painting that the CEO’s wife rescued from their basement.

Schatz is the first to admit that the housing they’ve hurriedly built for the receiving coils is too bulky. “No one would want to buy this,” he says, pointing to the pack that juts out from the back of the laptop, a pregnant plastic bulge that’s about a third as large as the device itself.

Given sufficient cooperation from equipment manufacturers, WiTricity is confident that it can incorporate its coil into the guts of any device. (Think of how computermakers like Apple (AAPL,Fortune 500) turned bulky Webcams into fingernail-size lenses that fit in a thin laptop case.) CEO Eric Giler, a veteran tech executive who ran a telecom company for 22 years, understands the importance of letting potential partners play with patented technology.

So far about a dozen companies — including Intel (INTC, Fortune 500) and Sony (SNE) — have tried replicating Soljacic’s groundbreaking MIT experiment in their own research facilities, just to make sure it’s the real deal. That might make other CEOs nervous, but not Giler.

“Our best customers are going to be the guys who try to do this,” he says, “because it is really hard.” The company is also talking to furniture manufacturers about fitting coils into desks and cubicle walls. The first announcement of a WiTricity partner product is expected toward the end of 2010.

Most of Giler’s potential customers have one major question: safety. “There’s a real perceptual problem,” he says. “People think we’re putting electricity in the air, and that’s called lightning, and they know to stay away from that.”

In fact, the coils turn electricity into magnetic fields, then back into electricity. And as any physicist will tell you, magnetic fields interact weakly with humans; as far as the fields are concerned, we are no different from air. (The Earth itself exudes a magnetic field.)

Initially, Giler was skeptical. Magnetism from MRI machines can disable pacemakers. Wouldn’t wireless electricity pose similar risks? Soljacic replied that MRI magnetism is about 10,000 times stronger than his version. The Institute of Physics in London concurs: WiTricity’s magnetic field “has no detrimental effects on the human body.”

Giler makes a point of standing between the coils whenever he demonstrates the technology. At the Nikkei electronics conference in Tokyo in October, he was able to power a 1,000-watt klieg light from across the room — a far cry from that 60-watt lightbulb in Soljacic’s first experiment. “We’re going up the power curve,” he says.

WiTricity’s record so far is 3,000 watts — enough to fully charge an electric car, so long as it’s in the same room (or garage). How big could WiTricity get? “Every single person in the world can relate to the problem of running out of batteries or having wires everywhere,” Giler says. “The market is so potentially huge that numbers become meaningless.”

A wireless electric world could free up designers to create entirely new kinds of products, no longer hemmed in by the need for boxy batteries or power supplies. As one of Giler’s VC investors says, “I bet you that’s your bestseller in five years’ time. You don’t even know what it is yet.”

Courtesy CNN.

Invisible Sound

Posted by Max On December - 6 - 2009 1 COMMENT

naxos-ceramic-x-wall-1At the offices of Emo Labs in Waltham, Mass., the receptionist’s desk and the meeting rooms look like an afterthought. The real action goes on behind a glass wall in a warehouse space where most of the 15 employees are soldering wires or fiddling with knobs on machines with sine-wave displays. For a visitor used to Silicon Valley startups with programmers staring at screens or frolicking at foosball tables, this is refreshingly old-school stuff.

CEO Jason Carlson points out the testing chamber that his team built by hand from foam and wood. Then he stops and taps at what looks like an ordinary photo frame on a desk.

“Imagine you’re in your office and you need to make a conference call,” he says. “You can connect your cell phone to this frame using Bluetooth, and suddenly your call is coming from it, clear as a bell. Wouldn’t that be cool?”

For the past 80 years, all loudspeakers have been based on roughly the same idea: A magnet creates force that causes a diaphragm to vibrate, producing sound. The quality of the sound varies with speaker size, but modern TV and computer-monitor design has forced speakers to get smaller and smaller. As a result, many tube TVs from the 1970s sound better than modern flat-screen TVs.

In 2001, Lewis Athenas, a loudspeaker designer working for Boston Acoustics, saw that consumers were increasingly playing music on their computers. He was nonplussed by the weedy sound from most desktop speaker systems. Then he discovered that by replacing the speaker magnet with a kind of ceramic known as a piezo actuator, he could make a computer screen act as the diaphragm. Put a thin strip of ceramic down each side of a see-through plastic membrane, and you’ve got stereo sound.

Athenas went to work in his garage. In 2005 he finished his first working prototype, a wooden frame around a 15-inch monitor. That same year he founded Emo Labs (Emo stands for “edge motion”) and raised $15 million from local venture capital firms.

Now just about any electronic device with a screen — a laptop, a cell phone, the latest and thinnest LED TV — can also be a speaker. Want better audio in your car? Wait till you hear it coming from your windshield. Like watching movies at home? You’ll love it even more when the dialogue actually comes out of the actors’ mouths.

At Emo Labs, Carlson played me a DVD of jazz singer Diana Krall performing live in Paris. The music came through loud and clear, with rich bass tones. “Touch it,” Carlson urged. “Feel the vibration of the screen. That’s what the sound is.”

Carlson left the CEO job at Semtech, a semiconductor manufacturer in Camarillo, Calif., and joined Emo Labs in 2006. He wanted to adapt the semiconductor-industry model of producing standardized components and selling them to equipment manufacturers. So Emo spent the next few years testing equipment, getting a toehold in China and Taiwan, and persuading naysayers at the equipment firms.

“I can’t tell you how many times we’ve sat in front of engineers, and they keep asking, ‘Where’s the sound coming from again?’” says Carlson. “It’s like their minds don’t want them to believe it.”

The company is tight-lipped on pricing and on which electronics giants it has struck deals with. Those companies should make their own announcements in the first half of 2010. (The products will not carry Emo Labs branding.) Carlson says the technology will add about a 10% price premium, so consumers should pay $100 more for a $1,000 TV equipped with Emo’s speaker.

Electronics firms have been deep-discounting their products for some time now, and even Carlson admits they are wary of any technology that could drive up the price of their products. Still, given that 160 million flat-panel TVs and 150 million laptops were sold in 2009, even a tiny slice of that market would be lucrative for Emo.

And that’s not counting the global loudspeaker business, set to hit $4.2 billion in 2010, according to research firm Electronics.ca. Carlson recently installed conventional speakers throughout his house. Wiring and tearing into walls cost more than the sound equipment, he says. “It would be beautiful if you could just use picture frames in each room,” he sighs. “Especially if they were wireless.”

To that end, Emo Labs has met with a company 20 miles down the road, near MIT. Its name is WiTricity.

Courtesy CNN.

Samsung Behold II: T-Mobile

Posted by Max On November - 15 - 2009 5 COMMENTS
Hey, look! Someone forked Android again. The Samsung Behold II, going on sale next week at T-Mobile for $229.99, will be T-Mobile’s most powerful Google Android phone when it goes on the market. But this Android phone doesn’t look or work like other Android phones, and that may be a minus.

samsung-behold-2-1There’s nothing wrong with dressing up Android. HTC did it brilliantly with the Hero and Droid Eris. But Samsung slapped their TouchWiz interface on here, which feels awkward at times.

The Behold II has solid, good-looking hardware. Like so many other phones nowadays, it’s a slab with a big touch screen and a bunch of buttons at the bottom. There’s a four-way cursor rocker instead of a trackball or optical mouse. The screen is a super-bright AMOLED panel with great color. On the plastic back, there’s a stylized map of the world.

One of the physical buttons activates the Behold II’s weirdest UI touch, the “cube.” The cube is an entirely pointless 3D graphic that lets you go to YouTube, the Amazon MP3 store, the music player, the video player, the Web browser or the picture gallery. If you shake the phone, the cube spins until it picks a random selection. It looks like somebody’s demo of their 3D graphics acceleration technology. It’s entirely silly.

You can ignore the Cube, but you can’t ignore all the other things Samsung has done to Android. Samsung dropped a bunch of buttons and menus on here to make the Behold II work and act like their other TouchWiz non-smartphones, devices like the Samsung Rogue and Highlight. That means a “quick list” button that pops up a very non-smartphone-looking menu grid. The standard Android apps drawer pops out of the side of the screen.

Here’s what Samsung decided to add: A new, much better camera app. A new camcorder app. A new music player , with a CoverFlow-like thing going on. A new and pointlessly ugly SMS app. New Exchange e-mail, but everybody does that with Android 1.5. New and uglier on-screen keyboard. New memo pad app, photo gallery, dialer, call log, video player. I could go on.

I’m not saying the changes here are all bad, but there sure are a lot of them, and they’re not as obviously positive as HTC’s changes were. Some UI elements and images seem rougher and less-finished even than the stock Android seen on the Samsung Moment for Sprint. For instance, I can’t figure out why they changed the dialer, and the stock Android dialer is nicer. The camera app, on the other hand, looks more like other Samsung cameraphones, and has lots of options.

Want to judge for yourself? Check out our slideshow which includes a UI comparison between the Behold II and Samsung Moment.

Beyond the new UI, the Behold II has a 5-megapixel camera and a pretty standard Qualcomm 528-MHz ARM11 processor, the same one that’s in the G1 and the MyTouch 3G . I’m not expecting any big performance surprises from this phone. But given that the G1 and MyTouch 3G are both a big step behind Sprint’s and Verizon’s Android phones in power, the Behold may be the leading Android choice for T-Mobile. We’ll see.

We’ll have a full review of the Behold II soon.

Palm Pixi: Now Available @ Sprint

Posted by Max On November - 15 - 2009 1 COMMENT

Sprint is now offering the Palm Pixi, a low-cost webOS-powered smartphone that is the successor to Palm’s Centro line. Like those earlier models, it has an easily pocketable design with a touchscreen, keyboard, and an afforable price.The Pixi is available now in Sprint stores and Sprint.com, where it is selling for $100 with a two-year service contract and $100 mail-in rebate.

It’s also available from other retailers, some of whom are offering lower prices. For example, new Sprint customers can get this model from Amazon.com or LetsTalk.com for $50.

An Overview of the Palm Pixi

palm_pixiThe Pixi can be thought of as the successor to Palm’s popular Centro series. Like those earlier consumer-friendly models, it has an easily pocketable design with a touchscreen, keyboard, and an affordable price.

This device has a tablet shape, with a 2.6-inch, 320-by-400-pixel, capacitive touchscreen. This display is smaller and has a lower resolution screen than its predecessor, the Palm Pre, but the Pixi itself is smaller and lighter, and sells for a lower price.

As mentioned earlier, this smartphone runs Palm’s webOS, a multi-tasking operating system able to wirelessly synchronize a wide variety of data with online services like Google, Facebook, Yahoo, and Microsoft Exchange.

It comes with a highly-capable web browser, email software, and multimedia player. Additional third-party applications are also available.

Sprint’s version of the Pixi includes the 3G mobile broadband standard EV-DO. It also has a GPS receiver and Bluetooth, but not Wi-Fi.

Dell’s Global Mini 3

Posted by Max On November - 14 - 2009 ADD COMMENTS

dell_mini_3Dell is launching its Android-based Mini 3 smartphone in China and Brazil. The global strategy seems questionable at face value, but contains a flash of genius as well. Tony Bradley

Dell unveiled the Android-based Mini 3 smartphone today and announced that it will be available soon in China and Brazil. Venturing away from the familiar server and desktop foundation that Dell is built on may seem risky, but there is a method to Dell’s madness that may just pay off.

The Dell Mini 3 may not impress on paper, but if it can capture the China market Dell will emerge victorious.Ever since rumors began to circulate earlier this year that Dell was planning a move into smartphones there have been naysayers. The market is crowded. Competition is rough. Dell is already losing ground in its core business. If your device isn’t from Apple and doesn’t say ‘iPhone’ it can’t succeed in the smartphone market.

Dell has tried to expand its portfolio of hardware over the years, distributing printers, cameras, PDA’s, televisions, and other Dell-branded peripherals. Those efforts have been met with mixed success, and even the best of them has been received moderately at best. The message to Dell for the most part has been ‘don’t quit your day job.’

The move by Dell into smartphones is not a desperate hail-mary, though, but a calculated strategy. A mobile phone is no longer just a mobile phone, it is a mobile computing device. The Mini 3 is not so much a branch into a new direction as it is a natural evolution of Dell’s core market.

The flip side this evolution is Nokia. Nokia has built its reputation as a provider of mobile devices. However, it too sees the writing on the wall in terms of the future of mobile computing which is why it has developed the Booklet 3G netbook. Dell and Nokia are coming at the problem from two different sides and meeting somewhere in the middle.

Why China then? If Dell wants to get into the smartphone market, why not launch the Mini 3 in the United States? With devices like the Motorola Droid, HTC Droid Eris, and Samsung Behold II the Android platform is taking the industry by storm and Dell could ride that wave of Android popularity.

Perhaps the better question to ask though is “why not China?” In the United States the total mobile phone market is around 270 million and Dell would have to engage in an exclusive distribution arrangement that would limit the market to less than 90 million.

Verizon and AT&T may dominate the mobile provider market in the United States, but from a global perspective they are the big fish in a small pond. China Mobile alone has a subscriber base nearly double the entire United States market. América Móvil, the parent of the provider Dell will be distributed through in Brazil, has more subscribers than Verizon and AT&T combined.

Some, like my PC World peer Jared Newman, have suggested that perhaps Dell is avoiding the United States market because the Mini 3 is underwhelming and Dell knows it would flop. The Mini 3 may not compare well on paper with other whiz bang smartphones in the United States, like the iPhone or the Droid, but Asia uses its mobile devices differently. I don’t know if you’ve noticed, but the iPhone hasn’t exactly been flying off the shelves since it launched in China.

As much as we like our gadgets, users in Europe and Asia are actually more demanding when it comes to mobile devices. Users in China expect to be able to order food from vending machines and pay for parking from their mobile phones.

It does seem risky for Dell, a brand established on servers and desktops, to dive into a highly competitive market like smartphones. At face value it may seem questionable to avoid launching in the United States. But, if Dell can carve a niche for the Mini 3 in a market like China it doesn’t need to try to be the next iPhone killer in the United States.

Dell’s Mini 3 strategy seems a little crazy. But, if it works Dell will be crazy like a fox and laughing all the way to the bank.

Apple Readies ‘World Mode’ iPhone

Posted by Max On November - 7 - 2009 ADD COMMENTS

A new report from OTR Global says Apple plans to release a UMTS/CDMA hybrid iPhone in the third quarter of 2010. If true, the new iPhone will play nice with Verizon’s network and spell an end to AT&T’s exclusivity contract in the U.S. — which is already slated to end sometime next year.

The report also notes the new phone has a 2.8-inch screen and smaller body, which is consistent with photos that surfaced on iLounge last June. The device would be manufactured by Taiwan-based Asustek subsidiary Pegatron.

A “worldmode” iPhone would be a colossal win for Apple. The device could support any major carrier worldwide. Apple wouldn’t need to sell different versions of the iPhone to support different networks, and would most likely see a huge increase in sales.

This news could be bad for AT&T, which has been snubbed by Apple and users alike for poor coverage, dropped calls, delayed MMS support, and lack of tethering.

The OTR report says Verizon and Apple have already reached an agreement to sell the new iPhone next year, despite Verizon’s recent advertising attacks on the iPhone.

Of course, switching to Verizon might solve some issues with poor coverage and dropped calls, but users might have to fork out an additional $30 a month for a 5GB monthly “unlimited” tethering plan and $15 a month for exchange service.

    Copyright © 2009 WiredGlitz.com