Thursday, July 29, 2010

Wiredglitz

The Tech Savvy Website

Apple’s secret to selling.

Posted by admin On January - 23 - 2010 ADD COMMENTS

Flash an exotic prototype, then—Presto!—get people to buy your more boring stuff. That kind of thinking still rules at most . under only shows off actual products. The difference? ’s arcane secret to success.

A specter harrows the : malaise. Like washed-up Catskill magicians unable to let go of old routines while a brash upstart steals their audience, nearly every maker of consumer electronics in the world clings to a quaint song-and-dance about prototypes.

“Here is your possible future,” they bark, flourishing the latest conceptual product from the lab. “Now watch us make it disappear!”

’s chief magician knows better, pulling solid objects out of the aether; products you can actually buy.

If this sounds like a minor complaint about most of the industry’s lack of imagination in marketing, you’re misunderstanding the whole act. The fact that does not reveal prototypes but shipping products is the fundamental difference between their entire business strategy and that of the rest of the industry. It evokes a feeling of trust between and consumers—that when actually reveals a product, it’s something that they’re confident enough to support for years to come.

For the better part of the last century—starting arbitrarily with the 1934 Chicago World’s Fair and its stark, Randian slogan: “Science Finds, Industry Applies, Man Conforms”—the producers of consumer goods have stuck to a basic formula: Show off a prototype; gauge public response; then release a commercial product that is less ambitious, if released at all.

It worked in part because it told a compelling story. “Here is what the future looks like; and here’s an intermediate step towards that future that you can buy today.” Electronics’ sister industries followed the same tack. Car shows were populated with prismatic concept cars hewn with non-Euclidean angles rotating on raised daises. Videogame tech demos showed graphics too impossible to believe, but entrancing enough to betray our better judgment.

But in Jobs’ encore performance, has changed the routine.

Outwardly ’s showmanship is competent, workmanlike. Jobs-as-performer wears an understated uniform that does not distract from the act. His humor, when it exists, is subtle. The closest an keynote gets to pomp are pie charts that look like wooden logs.

Yet when Jobs reveals the company’s next product, there’s a critical difference: It exists. When possible, it is available for retail purchase the same day. There are few maybes or eventuallys tempering the presentation: “Here is the tiny miracle we’ve created. We want to sell it to you today.”

As a counter-example, let me pick on Lenovo for a moment: At CES this year, they showed off the Ideapad U1 prototype, a netbook with a screen that could be decoupled from the keyboard to operate as a multitouch tablet. Clever idea, seemingly well considered and brain-bendingly not available for purchase today.

Do you see the story that Lenovo is spoiling for themselves? First, they’ve deprecated the imagined utility of every other they sell without the flashy removable tablet screen. Yet they’ve also whispered a nervous apology to potential customers: “We could make something this cool, but we’re not so confident in our plans to fully commit to them. Maybe you could tell us if you think you’d like this trick?”

Lenovo might make the U1. They might sell a few units. But simply by revealing it before it was a living, breathing SKU on retail shelves, they’ve relegated it to a quirky sideshow.

See also: The Chevy Volt, announced so long ago that GM has gone through a bankruptcy and shotgun CEO transition without actually being available for sale. Bet those will be flying off the lots.

Some of ’s peers understand the need to manage expectations. Have you ever seen RIM show off a BlackBerry prototype? What about Nintendo? They don’t pull a Microsoft-like move of showing very early-stage products to reporters and potential customers. They simply pull out a Wii or a DS and say, “This is it. Give it a try.”

Everybody loves a prototype. Engineers get a chance to strut their stuff. If you’ve got a 40-inch OLED TV in a lab somewhere, bring it to your trade show. Executives take pride in their company’s technical prowess. Marketers get an excuse to throw an even fancier party. And customers and press get idyll fodder for a daydream.

None of those things equal units sold. None of those things turn a customer into an ardent fan.

That an industry exists around rumors and leaks for unreleased products may be useful to , but it is a side-effect of their product strategy, not the basis of their marketing. Consider that when finally does release a product, the marketing tends to showcase the device itself in clear, comprehensible ways. isn’t shy to make claims about the grandiose, epiphanal nature of its products because—whether they pull it off or not—they have built a culture in which every product they make is designed to be world class.

Instead of prototypes, makes patents. Although I’m certain would keep these patents behind the curtain if they legally could, their existence proves something amazingly pedestrian: Behind the scenes, is essentially the same sort of company as every other electronics star in the world.

They’re developing prototypes. They’re trying new tricks, seeing what works. They know experimentation is the lifeblood of innovation.

But like the consummate showmen they are, they temper the wooly process of building the future with something missing from nearly every other company: restraint. may come off at times as a bit soulless, but at least they’ve got class. And when that class allows them to sell more products that make happier customers, I’ll take class over flash every time.

That the Consumer Electronics Show is held in Vegas is no accident. It’s a derelict spectacle meant to cater to mid-level buyers, gilt with the threadbare trappings of Innovation and Progress, but sending most of its audience home with nothing but a hangover and a t-shirt.

When pulls a tablet out of its hat next week, it’s likely that we won’t be able to purchase it for a couple of months, but rest assured that’s only because of regulatory pitfalls. And besides, there will be no doubt that when Jobs shows us his vision of the future, will be doing everything they can do to get them into our hands.

That’s the trick of it. Consumer audiences have grown wary of nearly a century of predictable sleight-of-hand. We’ve seen too many companies promise us the future, then fail to deliver it.

I believe that there are dozens of companies out there with the talent to pull the future toward us along some retail tesseract. But until they conquer their stage fright, leave aside the vaudevillian antics that savvy, jaded audiences no longer find compelling, and embrace a more honest and practical sort of conjuration, will continue to be the defining performance of our age.

Popularity: 16% [?]


Unique visitors to post: 0

Samsung Behold II: T-Mobile

Posted by admin On November - 15 - 2009 5 COMMENTS
Hey, look! Someone forked again. The Behold II, going on sale next week at for $229.99, will be ’s most powerful Google phone when it goes on the market. But this phone doesn’t look or work like other phones, and that may be a minus.

samsung-behold-2-1There’s nothing wrong with dressing up . HTC did it brilliantly with the Hero and Droid Eris. But slapped their TouchWiz interface on here, which feels awkward at times.

The Behold II has solid, good-looking hardware. Like so many other phones nowadays, it’s a slab with a big touch screen and a bunch of buttons at the bottom. There’s a four-way cursor rocker instead of a trackball or optical mouse. The screen is a super-bright AMOLED panel with great color. On the plastic back, there’s a stylized map of the world.

One of the physical buttons activates the Behold II’s weirdest UI touch, the “cube.” The cube is an entirely pointless 3D graphic that lets you go to YouTube, the Amazon MP3 store, the music player, the video player, the Web browser or the picture gallery. If you shake the phone, the cube spins until it picks a random selection. It looks like somebody’s demo of their 3D graphics acceleration . It’s entirely silly.

You can ignore the Cube, but you can’t ignore all the other things has done to . dropped a bunch of buttons and menus on here to make the Behold II work and act like their other TouchWiz non-smartphones, devices like the Rogue and Highlight. That means a “quick list” button that pops up a very non--looking menu grid. The standard apps drawer pops out of the side of the screen.

Here’s what decided to add: A new, much better camera app. A new camcorder app. A new music player , with a CoverFlow-like thing going on. A new and pointlessly ugly SMS app. New Exchange e-mail, but everybody does that with 1.5. New and uglier on-screen keyboard. New memo pad app, photo gallery, dialer, call log, video player. I could go on.

I’m not saying the changes here are all bad, but there sure are a lot of them, and they’re not as obviously positive as HTC’s changes were. Some UI elements and images seem rougher and less-finished even than the stock seen on the Moment for . For instance, I can’t figure out why they changed the dialer, and the stock dialer is nicer. The camera app, on the other hand, looks more like other cameraphones, and has lots of options.

Want to judge for yourself? Check out our slideshow which includes a UI comparison between the Behold II and Moment.

Beyond the new UI, the Behold II has a camera and a pretty standard Qualcomm 528-MHz ARM11 processor, the same one that’s in the G1 and the MyTouch . I’m not expecting any big performance surprises from this phone. But given that the G1 and MyTouch are both a big step behind ’s and Verizon’s phones in power, the Behold may be the leading choice for . We’ll see.

We’ll have a full review of the Behold II soon.

Popularity: 67% [?]


Unique visitors to post: 11

Palm Pixi: Now Available @ Sprint

Posted by admin On November - 15 - 2009 1 COMMENT

is now offering the Palm Pixi, a low-cost -powered that is the successor to Palm’s Centro line. Like those earlier models, it has an easily pocketable design with a touchscreen, keyboard, and an afforable price.The Pixi is available now in stores and .com, where it is selling for $100 with a two-year service contract and $100 mail-in rebate.

It’s also available from other retailers, some of whom are offering lower prices. For example, new customers can get this model from Amazon.com or LetsTalk.com for $50.

An Overview of the Palm Pixi

palm_pixiThe Pixi can be thought of as the successor to Palm’s popular Centro series. Like those earlier consumer-friendly models, it has an easily pocketable design with a touchscreen, keyboard, and an affordable price.

This device has a tablet shape, with a 2.6-inch, 320-by-400-pixel, capacitive touchscreen. This display is smaller and has a lower resolution screen than its predecessor, the Palm Pre, but the Pixi itself is smaller and lighter, and sells for a lower price.

As mentioned earlier, this runs Palm’s , a multi-tasking operating system able to wirelessly synchronize a wide variety of data with online services like Google, Facebook, Yahoo, and Microsoft Exchange.

It comes with a highly-capable web browser, email software, and multimedia player. Additional third-party applications are also available.

’s version of the Pixi includes the  mobile broadband standard EV-DO. It also has a GPS receiver and Bluetooth, but not Wi-Fi.

Popularity: 6% [?]


Unique visitors to post: 1

Dell’s Global Mini 3

Posted by admin On November - 14 - 2009 ADD COMMENTS

dell_mini_3 is launching its -based Mini 3 in China and Brazil. The global strategy seems questionable at face value, but contains a flash of genius as well. Tony Bradley

unveiled the -based Mini 3 today and announced that it will be available soon in China and Brazil. Venturing away from the familiar server and desktop foundation that is built on may seem risky, but there is a method to ’s madness that may just pay off.

The 3 may not impress on paper, but if it can capture the China market will emerge victorious.Ever since rumors began to circulate earlier this year that was planning a move into smartphones there have been naysayers. The market is crowded. Competition is rough. is already losing ground in its core business. If your device isn’t from and doesn’t say ‘’ it can’t succeed in the market.

has tried to expand its portfolio of hardware over the years, distributing printers, cameras, PDA’s, televisions, and other -branded peripherals. Those efforts have been met with mixed success, and even the best of them has been received moderately at best. The message to for the most part has been ‘don’t quit your day job.’

The move by into smartphones is not a desperate hail-mary, though, but a calculated strategy. A mobile phone is no longer just a mobile phone, it is a mobile computing device. The Mini 3 is not so much a branch into a new direction as it is a natural evolution of ’s core market.

The flip side this evolution is Nokia. Nokia has built its reputation as a provider of mobile devices. However, it too sees the writing on the wall in terms of the future of mobile computing which is why it has developed the Booklet netbook. and Nokia are coming at the problem from two different sides and meeting somewhere in the middle.

Why China then? If wants to get into the market, why not launch the Mini 3 in the United States? With devices like the Motorola Droid, HTC Droid Eris, and Behold II the platform is taking the industry by storm and could ride that wave of popularity.

Perhaps the better question to ask though is “why not China?” In the United States the total mobile phone market is around 270 million and would have to engage in an exclusive distribution arrangement that would limit the market to less than 90 million.

Verizon and may dominate the mobile provider market in the United States, but from a global perspective they are the big fish in a small pond. China Mobile alone has a subscriber base nearly double the entire United States market. América Móvil, the parent of the provider will be distributed through in Brazil, has more subscribers than Verizon and combined.

Some, like my PC World peer Jared Newman, have suggested that perhaps is avoiding the United States market because the Mini 3 is underwhelming and knows it would flop. The Mini 3 may not compare well on paper with other whiz bang smartphones in the United States, like the or the Droid, but Asia uses its mobile devices differently. I don’t know if you’ve noticed, but the hasn’t exactly been flying off the shelves since it launched in China.

As much as we like our gadgets, users in Europe and Asia are actually more demanding when it comes to mobile devices. Users in China expect to be able to order food from vending machines and pay for parking from their mobile phones.

It does seem risky for , a brand established on servers and desktops, to dive into a highly competitive market like smartphones. At face value it may seem questionable to avoid launching in the United States. But, if can carve a niche for the Mini 3 in a market like China it doesn’t need to try to be the next killer in the United States.

’s Mini 3 strategy seems a little crazy. But, if it works will be crazy like a fox and laughing all the way to the bank.

Popularity: 9% [?]


Unique visitors to post: 2

Apple Readies ‘World Mode’ iPhone

Posted by admin On November - 7 - 2009 ADD COMMENTS

A new report from OTR Global says plans to release a UMTS/ hybrid in the third quarter of 2010. If true, the new will play nice with Verizon’s network and spell an end to ’s exclusivity contract in the U.S. — which is already slated to end sometime next year.

The report also notes the new phone has a 2.8-inch screen and smaller body, which is consistent with photos that surfaced on iLounge last June. The device would be manufactured by Taiwan-based Asustek subsidiary Pegatron.

A “worldmode” would be a colossal win for . The device could support any major carrier worldwide. wouldn’t need to sell different versions of the to support different networks, and would most likely see a huge increase in sales.

This news could be bad for , which has been snubbed by and users alike for poor coverage, dropped calls, delayed MMS support, and lack of tethering.

The OTR report says Verizon and have already reached an agreement to sell the new next year, despite Verizon’s recent advertising attacks on the .

Of course, switching to Verizon might solve some issues with poor coverage and dropped calls, but users might have to fork out an additional $30 a month for a 5GB monthly “unlimited” tethering plan and $15 a month for exchange service.

Popularity: 22% [?]


Unique visitors to post: 4

    Copyright © 2009 WiredGlitz.com